Dan as far as I am concerned is an alt who is so disparate to convince us of something that is inconsistent about scientist already have consensus on; even going as far as using an article which its conclusion that tries to site a study that doesn't back it.
I don't think that we should make any further attempts to answer him directly as he clearly is in a category that is often fits perfectly as a troll.
I don't think that we should make any further attempts to answer him directly as he clearly is in a category that is often fits perfectly as a troll.
posted by:
|
SF Bay Area
|
-
Unsu...
Re: About Dan
Tue, February 19, 2008 - 11:45 AMWhats the matter Ted, where you looking for consensus here? I have offered a different view and that makes me a "troll" whose views are not worthy of consideration? You need your head examined bud. -
-
Re: About Dan
Tue, February 19, 2008 - 3:16 PMWe considered your views and think you need to go to school and learn some math and science. -
-
Unsu...
Re: About Dan
Tue, February 19, 2008 - 3:27 PMoh really, but the "tedster" who confuses hydrogen with hydrocarbons is just alright with you then?
My degree is in science "B" and I taught high school science for 8 years. Nice bluff anyway.:-) -
-
Re: About Dan
Tue, February 19, 2008 - 11:00 PMIt's not a bluff. I pitty your students. -
-
Unsu...
Re: About Dan
Thu, February 21, 2008 - 11:22 AM"I pitty your students."
I pitty your teacher.
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: About Dan
Tue, February 19, 2008 - 3:30 PMbtw, since your argument has descended to nothing but attacks, perhaps a little refresher course on spelling might be considered by you.
"challow" is spelled Shallow.
"predoction" is spelled production.
-
-
